• EatATaco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Probably should have started with that.

    I did. At least pretty clearly when I said they were crowning themselves king rather than the POTUS king. Apparently, tho, I have to say I disagree with the ruling in every post or posters will assume that any disagreement with someone who claims the ruling is wrong must mean I think the ruling is correct. I guess I should have known this already tho.

    BTW, I never called you this.

    “Did you read the fucking dissent? That’s a sitting SC Justice saying that quote, not some arm chair IANAL basement dweller:”

    Funny to read you say my post, which doesn’t even remotely imply that I think the ruling was correct, implies that. . .but when you respond to my point, saying it is wrong, and throwing in “not some arm chair IANAL basement dweller,” that doesn’t imply you think that about me.

    I responded more directly since your ire seems to be pointed at me.

    You’re projecting here, as you were the one cursing at me and insulting people. I said nothing about you and I’m not really irked at all; I understand fully how partisan the average poster is and that any dissent is going to get piled on.

    • massacre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Apologies if it came off that way. Truly meant that as a generalization and pretty much include myself in the snark if it matters at this point…

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Apology accepted. I also apologize for snarking back. Lol