• PythagreousTitties
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Bernie would have won if the DNC wasn’t so heavily focused on it being her “turn”. And then it was Joes “turn” after that. Bernie was the only person Trump was afraid of.

    Not saying you’re wrong or anything. Just adding to it.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This wasn’t true about Biden. The establishment didn’t care who won that primary, as long as it wasn’t Bernie. I think Harris was their first choice, but they flipped to Biden when she tanked.

      • PythagreousTitties
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Biden absolutely believes he “earned” his time as president. He’s a life long politician that went through all the steps for it.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          That may be, but he’s better at hiding it than Hillary. She seemed to always be making it clear that it was her turn. That message came across much more strongly than anything else.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh, Biden himself does actually believe that, but that’s true of pretty much every president. I do think it’s a little more extreme in his case than for most.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      That is entirely possible.

      However, I am not convinced Bernie could have gotten an agenda through either. It’s not exactly like his political ideals are even loved by a lot of the Democrats in government.

      Not saying I wouldn’t have wanted him for president, I voted for him. But I am not convinced he would have been any more effective than Carter.

      It’s really hard to implement a progressive agenda when even the so-called left isn’t on that agenda’s side.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        Look to FDR as a model of what happens when a progressive agenda gets a firebrand President. It’s not like the politics were all that different, or Congress any less corrupt.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          I disagree. The politics were a lot different. For example, the filibuster worked completely differently.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                That’s the point of the firebrand President. We have not had a President since FDR who knows how to stand up to special interests and even their own party when necessary.

                  • Tinidril@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    You mean on principal? Those in Congress with principals are on our side. Those without principals can be convinced it’s in their best interest. Don’t fall for the facade that anything that happens in Congress is ideologically driven.

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                The point is that it’s a self-imposed handicap. If a party has 50%+ in both houses and the presidency, they have the ability to pass whatever they like and choose not to use it.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I agree. And they wouldn’t have gotten rid of that handicap if Bernie was president because it benefits them.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The left functionality doesn’t exist in this country. We stamped them out in the Cold War and replaced them with the new Democrats who were all for social progressivism but economically were beholden to corporate interests. Then you have the conservatives who are so socially regressive they think Sharia Law is a roadmap and are so in bed with corporate interests that they’d be fine if kids died in coal mines as long as someone at the top is getting paid.

        We can’t have the true left back until we get voting reform. Ranked choice or approval voting is essential to allow 3rd parties to have a chance to flourish without causing a spoiler effect. That will also pull the Overton window back to the left again as the two major political parties will have less of an incentive to court extremists and will see better results at the polls if their platforms appeal to as many people as possible.