Australia accused of discriminating against disabled migrants

When Luca was born in a Perth hospital two years ago, it flipped his parents’ world in ways they never expected.

With the joy came a shocking diagnosis: Luca had cystic fibrosis. Then Australia - Laura Currie and her husband Dante’s home for eight years - said they couldn’t stay permanently. Luca, his parents were told, could be a financial burden on the country.

“I think I cried for like a week - I just feel really, really sorry for Luca,” Ms Currie says. “He’s just a defenceless two-and-a-half-year-old and doesn’t deserve to be discriminated against in that way.”

With a third of its population born abroad, Australia has long seen itself as a “migration nation” - a multicultural home for immigrants that promises them a fair go and a fresh start. The idea is baked into its identity. But the reality is often different, especially for those who have a disability or a serious medical condition.

  • Wanderer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Countries don’t allow anyone in. They get to pick and choose who they want. That’s literally how immigration works.

    If they let anyone in and gave then free healthcare then everyone could just go there and get free healthcare. That’s doesn’t make and sense, that’s completely unsustainable.

    They are on a working visa. They aren’t on some 1950’s move here and become a citizen visa.

    • optissima@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      How is having a larger workforce that can support more free healthcare not sustainable? Do you think migrants don’t work or anything?

      • Wanderer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If anyone could go there for free healthcare then a lot of people without free healthcare would go there.

        If free healthcare care is so easy why doesn’t ever country do it?

      • Wanderer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I meant permanently.

        They must be on temporary visas. A temporary visa is not a visa to citizenship.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          They would have been on a 457 visa which means they were indeed temporary, but they had skills in demand. It is a pathway to citizenship.

          Point is, we’re not just letting people show up for medical treatment.

          • Wanderer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s a potential pathway not a guarantee.

              • Wanderer
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Well I didn’t say that so I’m not sure what you are on about.

                  • Wanderer
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Yea if. If Australia did that.

                    But they aren’t are they?

                    This people don’t sound like they are are going to get medical care but they are being caught out by a completely logical Australian immigration restriction.