• deaf_fish
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s fair. I think generally anarchists have good ideas. If there is a violent revolution, I would probably end up being your comrade in arms.

    I don’t think we would win though. Most people think anarchism is a bad word right now. I can’t imagine recruiting fighters during the revolution under the banner of anarchism. Hell even progressivism isn’t very popular. As always, liberals are the problem.

    We may have to have a revolution but I think it needs way more time to cook.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’d participate in revolution because I’m not so ideologically entrenched that I’d refuse participation any anti-capitalist movement, but my ideal vision would be more aligned to what the Zapatistas have tried to do

      • deaf_fish
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Interesting. I’m pretty ignorant about the Zapatistas. Looking over the Wikipedia and they seem all right.

        I don’t quite follow you. Do you mean like instead of winning the revolution. You take a chunk of the country create borders and install some kind of anarchy?

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not sure “borders” is a term they’d use, but generally speaking yeah

          Anarchism can start at the community level and often doesn’t necessitate revolution