Title
Left/liberals/democrats are such disgustingly evil and vile people. Only they’d actively try and kill some one because of their deep seeded hatred. Fucking mentally deranged lunatics. I swear.
Left/liberals/democrats are such disgustingly evil and vile people. Only they’d actively try and kill some one because of their deep seeded hatred. Fucking mentally deranged lunatics. I swear.
So now that the shooters voter registration has been plastered everywhere and it’s well known he was a Republican
Regardless, can you direct me to an example of left wing violence in the past 30 years?
There’ve been many, many, far right shooters. Uvalde, Christchurch, Vegas immediately all come to mind.
Idr about the DC Sniper, I assume he was R bc he was a cop, and damn near 99% of cops are R… but DC Sniper went rouge because he saw the forces underbelly, the wanton rampant police corruption. Which would make it = institutionalized right wing corruption.
With the shite supreme court overstepping and creating laws on the bench (fucking activist judges) when that’s the expressed duty of Congress alone, gave us qualified immunity and civil asset forfeiture, which immediately led to the police being the largest organized crime ring in the country, if you dont count corporations wage theft and profiteering. More money and property has been looted from regular people every year since 2001 than all criminals scombined have stolen.
Don’t believe a word I said, don’t believe what anyone says. Look it up for yourself. The violent side of the political spectrum is the right, exponentially. For every one act of left wing violence (which is always like, pipeline protests or tree hugging, the Earth Liberation Front disbanded in the 90s) there’s a 100 right wing ones.
I was at the BLM protests in Seattle. I saw with my own eyes, there’s video and pictures of it online too, that the cops instigated the violence, not only attacking unprovoked, but swinging on a 5’2" white girl with a yellow umbrella. That’s right wing violence.
Fact check me. If you find I’m being a little hyperbolic, does the point still stand? Just look at the facts man. The economy does better with a Dem as president. Look at the facts. I fucking despise Democrats but truth is truth. Denying truth is denying God creation, it’s motherfucking blasphemy my guy.
Uvalde motive officially undetermined but he was a bullied former student. He and most of the victims were Hispanic. This all started with an argument with his grandmother after which he shot her. There didn’t appear to be premeditation or a political angle of any sort.
Christchurch was indeed unambiguously RW.
Vegas - Paddock was not a registered voter (seemingly ever) and the motive for this shooting remains undetermined.
DC Snipers were Black Nation of Islam members and the older one was ex military, not a cop. Assassinations were supposedly designed to cover up the initial murder of a woman the older one had a gripe with so seemingly not political.
WRT left wing violence:
Aiden Hale - Trans school shooter who wrote in their manifesto that they wanted to kill due to the kids “White privlages(sic)”
Michael Reinoehl - Antifa activist who sneak attack killed a patriot front marcher with two gunshots. This is infamous because he gave a tv interview afterwards claiming self defense but the entire thing was caught on surveillance camera.
James Hodgkinson - Leftwing activist who shot up a congressional baseball game seriously injuring Republican lawmaker Steve Scalise
I’ve limited this to gun violence because it’s less ambiguous. You clearly consider the BLM protests mostly (or perhaps entirely) peaceful while I don’t.
I appreciate the post and the clarification, I devote very little long term memory to details of these events as it’s just not relevant to my life and records are available if needed.
I see now I was confusing Uvalde with the San Antonio shooting, the one that propelled Beto to run against Abbott. I’m not a Texan, I just follow politics religiously.
And taken by percentages BLM was primarily peaceful. There was violence, obviously. Like in Kenosha. Like with the police responding to criticism of being too violent by being too violent. In Seattle they tear gassed square miles of capitol hill nightly, all while gaslighting everyone every morning on trumped up accusations that medics couldn’t get thru (they could, no one has beef with the FD), and they wouldn’t do it again. You couldn’t hide in your apartment to escape it, thus making sure all babies and grandmother’s were punished for their crimes of existing. Collateral damage like that, callously and repeatedly, is terrorism.
They played every tactic right outta the domestic violence handbook, and to put it simply, that disqualifies any legitimacy they have. Authority has to hold itself to a higher moral standard or else dystopia, which is evidence by our shared reality.
If our power structures can’t hold themselves up to our virtues, then expecting anyone to foster virtue is a fools errand. In any system other than authoritan you can’t ask of others what you yourself won’t do. That’s the natural order, that’s what rings true with our internal sense of justice. I’m aware theres a wide chasm between justice and our jurisprudence, but again, higher standards.
Ultimately, I see any and every action that disperses power out to the many, and out of the hands of a few as a net gain for society. We can’t wait 2000 years for another Cinnicinatus or Washington. There’s a reason they are venerated, and the current global right wing wave is polar opposite their example. Fascism rises because of income inequality, not multi-culturalism or cosmopolitanism. The youth of the old “in group” gets priced out and they say fuck that. I get it, it’s just the wrong answer. Hitler scapegoated the Jews bc the Catholic Church, when they respected the no usury rule, essentially railroaded the Jews into money lending cuz they had a need for services they couldn’t commit. But Jews had no law against usury. Usury is still illegal in Islam to this day.
The problem is with the bankers, as it always fucking has been. Not just bankers, today it’s more broad but essentially those who move paper to make paper. Insurance, etc etc. obfuscation leads to greed, neoliberalism fetishized greed and now if your born after 1980 you’ll never own a house. I get it. The proper reaction, y’know, justice, isn’t to conserve the financial system and attack minorities. It’s to flip those two around.