A judge ruled last month Sandra Hemme must be freed or retried for the 1980 murder within 30 days, but the Missouri Attorney General fought to keep her imprisoned.

A woman whose murder conviction was overturned after she served 43 years in prison  was released Friday, after Missouri’s attorney general fought for more than a month to keep her behind bars.

Sandra Hemme, 63, left prison Friday in Chillicothe, hours after a judge threatened to hold the attorney general’s office in contempt if they continued to fight against her release. She reunited with her family at a nearby park, where she hugged her daughter and granddaughter. Her sister, Joyce Ann Kays, was all grins.

The judge originally ruled on June 14 that Hemme’s attorneys had established “clear and convincing evidence” of “actual innocence” and overturned the conviction. But Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey fought her release in the courts.

  • rickyrigatoni
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 months ago

    She spent her entire adult life in prison. How do you even come back from that.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hear me out.

        Companies sell life insurance. Actuaries determine how much a policy costs. They can also determine what is most likely to have been a person’s lifetime earnings based on a variety of metrics about that person.

        An actuary should be able to look at who Sandra Hemme was at 20 years old, and make a determination of what her lifetime earnings would have been if she had not gone to prison. The State should pay her that amount.

        • OopsAllTwix@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then multiply that figure by 10 or more. The state should be punished for that mistake and not want to make similar mistakes again.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh sure. “That amount” would be the compensatory part. The punitive part would be an entirely other thing.

            • el_abuelo@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              She also needs to be compensated for lost time and events, relationships etc that never happened because of the state. There’s more to compensation than just the money they could have earned.

          • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            And take every penny out of the AG and police budgets. If that goes over budgets, then start taking it from pensions.

            People that hold the power of life, death, and freedom over others should pay the full cost of their fuck ups

    • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You don’t. Where are you going to work? What can you put on your CV? What work experience do you have? On top of that your ability to learn is a far cry of what you had in your 20s. If you have no family who’ll take care of you, your future is utterly fucked. You’re destined to live in poverty until the end of your life.

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I didn’t think you really could. From now on, everything will be a new experience. All things and persons she knew, have changed.

      All things and persons she knows, are still in prison.

      You have the very positive fact, that you were proven innocent and that you are out of prison.

      But, she shouldn’t have been there in the first place.

      Btw, is she getting a fair amount of money for this or will this be like: Shit happens, sorry ma’am?