return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agoIn Tim Walz, Democrats see a potential VP pick who can shore up the 'blue wall'www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down112
arrow-up162arrow-down1external-linkIn Tim Walz, Democrats see a potential VP pick who can shore up the 'blue wall'www.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squarePythagreousTittieslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down1·2 months agoI care more about if they’re qualified than what color or gender they are.
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down14·2 months agoLiterally anyone nominated will be “qualified”. We have plentiful qualified options in any color and gender combination. Implying otherwise is just a dogwhistle from the right to say “why not white male, they’re better”.
minus-squarePythagreousTittieslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·2 months agoTrump and Vance are absolutely not qualified.
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months ago*sigh* For the Democrats. The party we’re talking about right now. JFC.
minus-squarePythagreousTittieslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agoPoint is, just being nominated does not qualify anyone if they’re a terrible pick.
I care more about if they’re qualified than what color or gender they are.
Literally anyone nominated will be “qualified”. We have plentiful qualified options in any color and gender combination. Implying otherwise is just a dogwhistle from the right to say “why not white male, they’re better”.
Trump and Vance are absolutely not qualified.
*sigh* For the Democrats. The party we’re talking about right now. JFC.
Point is, just being nominated does not qualify anyone if they’re a terrible pick.