Thanks ahead of time for your feedback

  • calabast
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It blows my mind when I think about where we might be headed with this tech. We’ve gotten SO used to the ability to communicate instantly with people far away in the technology age, how will we adapt when we have to go back 300 years and can only trust something someone tells us in person. Will we go back to local newspapers? Or can we not even trust that? Will we have public amphitheaters in busy parts of town, where people will around the news? And we can only trust these people, who have a direct chain of acquaintance all the way back to the source of the information? That seems extreme, but I dunno.

    I think most likely we won’t implement extreme measures like that, to ensure we’re still getting genuine information. I think most likely we’ll just slip into completely generated false news from every source, no longer have any idea what’s really going on, but be convinced this AI thing was overblown, and have no idea we’re being controlled.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think it will be quite that bad. Society worked before photography was invented and now we have cryptographic ways to make sure you’re really talking to the person you think you’re talking to.

      • calabast
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Truuue, I hadn’t thought of that. Okay, at least it won’t be as bad as I feared.

        Now I just have to sell all these vintage printing presses I bought…