• mosiacmango
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Dude, it’s comic books. People fly around in their underpants and shoot lasers from their eyes. The conceit of Batman is that yes, he’s nuts, but the Wayne’s have always been intense philanthropists. Like, actually “good” billionaires, also very comic books and just as likely in our world as laser eyed underpants flying people.

    The current conceit is that it doesn’t matter what you do in Gotham, underwear or hundreds of billions in goodwill. It will consume you and any who exist in its domain.

      • mosiacmango
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The settings conceits shift at a whim, and have done so for 80+ years. They exist, then don’t. They all warp and change however is needed by whoever is needed.

        At one point, a dude punches reality. Literally hits reality with his fists.

        Its fine to argue about any art form, but I think the most pertinent critique of comics is that it’s art for capital. Any story element or setting is for sale in our world. Taking the inner world at any face value while ignoring that is pointless.

      • mosiacmango
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The writers pen.

        A batman comic book does not have realistic economic systems. Its all hand-wavy bullshit in-service of Batman flying around doing whatever.