• mosiacmango
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    5 million dollars is on the line. Paying 10k to get it is a good investment.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      The lawyer probably did it on spec. He promised 5 mill to anyone who proved him wrong.

      16 hours of work that gets paid by Lindell for a very-easy win? Absolutely.

      • mosiacmango
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Sure, but this was legitimate. Lindell admitted he had no intention to pay the 5 million, he just wanted to gin up free publicity.

        He thought that “since you can’t prove a negative” that he wouldn’t have to pay. The judge in the case however found that since the data was literally technical gibberish, that the plaintiff proved that it could not be what Lindell had claimed it was, and was owed the promised payout.