• Spzi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s not a big enough part that we should prioritize tackling it compared to other, significantly worse parts.

    The bulk of resources should be dedicated to massively lowering energy contributions

    Yes, but reducing animal products in diets does not require any investments or resources. On large scales, it even frees up resources.

    It’s a decision everyone makes three times a day. You can decide against animal products on your plate and still eat a comparably tasty, healthy, affordable meal. No other way to reduce emissions is that easy. Most require upfront investments, construction work, dedication and long term commitment.