You’re imaging that these right wingers sit at non-existent border control points, “randomly” screening “immigrant looking” people. That’s the implication at least. Which is what I’ve reiterated half a dozen times now, but which seems to be something you’re not able to address.
No, that’s not what I have been implying at all. I am not addressing it because I didn’t say it. In some countries right wing extremists are banned from working in the civil or secret service. No what I am saying is that they will pass laws that restrict which nationalities are allowed into the country, similar to trump’s muslim ban that was overturned only using actual laws instead of bullshit executive orders.
I get that at your age, it’s hard to admit when you do something silly, and you’re constantly worried about what other people think. That’s why you got so red in the face when I pointed out your mistakes. You just keep pretending you didn’t say stupid shit you immediately walk back or ignore after I point out it’s stupidity.
I haven’t walked back anything. You’re just incapable of actually understanding someone else’s point of view.
How old do you think I am? I dare you to guess.
You claimed that people would be subjected to “border control and immigration”, not realising you apply for a visa at an embassy, not at the border. This entirely thread is you pretending you didn’t say stupid shit you could’ve easily checked before posting.
Yes, and laws determine who does and who dosen’t get a visa. If the right wing can change immigration laws, then they can stop them from getting a visa potentially before they even board a plane. It’s also pretty easy to tell where someone’s passport is from once something like this is enshrined into law.
Now you’re equicovating over how easy you presume it would be for someone to leave the agreement, which it wouldn’t be. It’d cost billions.
I am not saying it wouldn’t have an impact. It would cost money to setup borders, and obviously would have some impact on tourism. Still nothing compared to what the UK did in leaving the EU. While it has cost us significantly we are still standing. The economy didn’t collapse completely even with covid thrown in on top. Now that COVID-19 restrictions are all but over weathering that economic storm becomes a lot easier for other countries. You also have to think that places that might implement something like that ala Germany are in a stronger economic position to begin with. If they left both Schengen and the EU it would have a big impact on the EU, not just on Germany.
Yes, EU has an agreement about free movement as well. So? Remember that time when you started talking about the EU without having noticed that I actually hadn’t even mentioned it?
You didn’t have to actually mention it. Schengen is literally an EU initiative. I couldn’t care less if you actually said the words European Union. This is the second time I have gone over this if you remember.
To be clear I don’t want anymore countries to leave the EU, nor do I want them to leave Schengen. I believe in immigration at least within the confines of Europe.
Honestly you are going in circles at this point. Half the points you are arguing against I have already given answers to, or are entirely made up in your head. Unless you show some degree of improvement in your next reply and actually start showing some fucking respect I am just going to block you and move on.
So to recap, you’re in a thread that I started with “Europe enjoys free borders” and now you’ve gone all the way to “well actually if a country left the EU and Schengen and that country had American style executive orders and not a robust legal system and then instated a xenophobic check on people then yes, I would be correct in backing up the guy who explicitly said Western Europeans get treated differently, because these non-Europeans would be subjected to checks.”
And you say you’re not moving the goalposts of your argument? Interesting.
How old do I think you are? Mentally around 18-20, clearly. I hope your physical age matches.
“Schengen is literally a EU initiative”
And you argued that my comment about the meaning of my comment, in this thread, started by my comment, was “irrelevant”.
I couldn’t care less if you actually said the words European Union.
I think you very much could. What I bet happened is you thought I had written “EU”, which is why you used it specifically. Then when I pointed out I hadn’t, you got flustered, because you’re not accustomed to publicly admitting to mistakes.
“Some degree of improvement”
Rofl, thank for the giggles. Irony is enjoyable at this hour, after a few rums.
“I’m just going to block you and move on.”
Ohno whatever will I do with my life if you don’t want to talk to me because you have a hard time admitting to mistakes ohnooo.
You’ve not had an argument, at all. Europe still does enjoy open borders. We’re not living in some fantasy future of yours where countries separate from the EU and Schengen and get far-right governments in total power.
So what is your argument exactly? “In a very specific hypothetical setting I came up with, non-Europeans coming into the Schengen area before having been able to apply for visas means Europe isn’t ‘Enjoying open borders’”?
Are you just mad that while you are European, you still don’t have free movement like we do, because of Brexit?
No, that’s not what I have been implying at all. I am not addressing it because I didn’t say it. In some countries right wing extremists are banned from working in the civil or secret service. No what I am saying is that they will pass laws that restrict which nationalities are allowed into the country, similar to trump’s muslim ban that was overturned only using actual laws instead of bullshit executive orders.
I haven’t walked back anything. You’re just incapable of actually understanding someone else’s point of view.
How old do you think I am? I dare you to guess.
Yes, and laws determine who does and who dosen’t get a visa. If the right wing can change immigration laws, then they can stop them from getting a visa potentially before they even board a plane. It’s also pretty easy to tell where someone’s passport is from once something like this is enshrined into law.
I am not saying it wouldn’t have an impact. It would cost money to setup borders, and obviously would have some impact on tourism. Still nothing compared to what the UK did in leaving the EU. While it has cost us significantly we are still standing. The economy didn’t collapse completely even with covid thrown in on top. Now that COVID-19 restrictions are all but over weathering that economic storm becomes a lot easier for other countries. You also have to think that places that might implement something like that ala Germany are in a stronger economic position to begin with. If they left both Schengen and the EU it would have a big impact on the EU, not just on Germany.
You didn’t have to actually mention it. Schengen is literally an EU initiative. I couldn’t care less if you actually said the words European Union. This is the second time I have gone over this if you remember.
To be clear I don’t want anymore countries to leave the EU, nor do I want them to leave Schengen. I believe in immigration at least within the confines of Europe.
Honestly you are going in circles at this point. Half the points you are arguing against I have already given answers to, or are entirely made up in your head. Unless you show some degree of improvement in your next reply and actually start showing some fucking respect I am just going to block you and move on.
“They will pass”
Oh they will will they?
So to recap, you’re in a thread that I started with “Europe enjoys free borders” and now you’ve gone all the way to “well actually if a country left the EU and Schengen and that country had American style executive orders and not a robust legal system and then instated a xenophobic check on people then yes, I would be correct in backing up the guy who explicitly said Western Europeans get treated differently, because these non-Europeans would be subjected to checks.”
And you say you’re not moving the goalposts of your argument? Interesting.
How old do I think you are? Mentally around 18-20, clearly. I hope your physical age matches.
“Schengen is literally a EU initiative”
And you argued that my comment about the meaning of my comment, in this thread, started by my comment, was “irrelevant”.
I think you very much could. What I bet happened is you thought I had written “EU”, which is why you used it specifically. Then when I pointed out I hadn’t, you got flustered, because you’re not accustomed to publicly admitting to mistakes.
“Some degree of improvement”
Rofl, thank for the giggles. Irony is enjoyable at this hour, after a few rums.
“I’m just going to block you and move on.”
Ohno whatever will I do with my life if you don’t want to talk to me because you have a hard time admitting to mistakes ohnooo.
You’ve not had an argument, at all. Europe still does enjoy open borders. We’re not living in some fantasy future of yours where countries separate from the EU and Schengen and get far-right governments in total power.
So what is your argument exactly? “In a very specific hypothetical setting I came up with, non-Europeans coming into the Schengen area before having been able to apply for visas means Europe isn’t ‘Enjoying open borders’”?
Are you just mad that while you are European, you still don’t have free movement like we do, because of Brexit?