• NormalPerson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      Their bias and a wildly suspicious source that’s pretty much the podcast my best friend once removed’s half-sister’s uncle listens to

    • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’d seen this all multiple places before but doing a quick search here is a source on the most recent round of Netflix and superman stuff

      Source

      Personally I think a lot of this is overblown. Specifically the not wanting shirtless scenes and stuff is a personal thing that’s up to the comfort of the actor. The bits I don’t like are harassing women and his previous comments about the MeToo movement which make me far more likely to believe the current accusations against him.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        LOL this is the fourth “I have seen it in multiple places” yet keep posting the same sketchy source over and over…

        • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          27 days ago

          Replying to everyone who asked with a source with the source was the best way to make sure everyone who wanted to be notified was notified. Not everyone is going to return to the original comment to look for an edit.

      • Pistcow
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        27 days ago

        K. First time seeing this site and the media bias is more like bullshit clickbait. Dude is passionate about source material and willing to walk when they make that bullshit season 3.

        • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          27 days ago

          Admittedly I did not do a lot of digging for the best source and instead just skimmed and saw it summarizing the stuff I’d heard before. The original information comes from a podcast but instead of sourcing the podcast, the article decided to source a reddit thread which was just a transcript of the podcast… Bad journalism and I should’ve found a better source to site here. Either way, the original transcript is shown in the article.

            • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              21
              ·
              27 days ago

              I mean the original transcript is in the article and it’s a primary source. I just sent a link that poorly sourced the original podcast. It’s not really a lack of proof and more so that the article is poorly displaying the proof we have.

                • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  27 days ago

                  You’re all good :D this turned into a much more heated conversation in general and I also apologize for starting it. I should’ve included the primary source in the original message in the first place either way.

                  I’m also sorry this turned out the way it did and I really appreciate and accept your apology. Lemmy is small enough that it’s very possible we’ll be seeing each other’s names in the future (and probably often) and I want you to know that I will be thinking highly of you when I do.