Members of Brazil’s supreme court have unanimously voted to uphold the ban on X, after Elon Musk’s refusal to comply with local laws led to the social network being blocked in one of its biggest markets.

On Monday, five of the court’s justices were asked to consider Friday’s decision to temporarily banish X from Brazil, where the platform has more than 21 million users. By lunchtime all five had voted in favour of the ban.

Casting his vote in favour of X’s continued suspension, Flávio Dino said the company’s decision to “deliberately” ignore a court order to name a legal representative in Brazil suggested it “considered itself above the rule of law”.

  • Monomate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    13 days ago

    ISPs shall block, X users shall use VPN to circumvent.

      • Monomate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        13 days ago

        When a X user finds himself unable to load X’s main page or the app, he will be motivated to investagate why, and finally he’ll find out VPNs are the solution. X’s brazilian users were already discussing and suggesting VPNs to each other on the days leading up to the block. And the block is not 100% yet: smaller ISPs are taking longer to set up the block.

        • deus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          13 days ago

          Yeah, I doubt most people will go this route. VPNs cost money, Twitter alternatives are free.

          • Monomate
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Free VPNs don’t cost money. And times have changed: there are some reputable free VPNs, like ProtonVPN and Cloudflare’s WARP.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          13 days ago

          You mean: when an X user finds themselves unable to load the main page, they’ll get frustrated, uninstall the app and leave a review about how it’s broken.

          You grossly overestimate the tech savvyness of your average internet user, and their willingness to spend any amount of time or money to fix a minor inconvenience.

          • Monomate
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            13 days ago

            If the solution is as simple as downloading a VPN app from the smartphone app store and clicking “activate VPN,” I wouldn’t consider it tech-savvy territory. In the past, VPNs were indeed esoteric tech for nerds, but nowadays they’re commoditized stuff. And if Brazil’s regime keeps getting more repressive under the dictator, with the blocking of more social media sites, more people will have the opportunity/necessity to learn about VPNs.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      The judge that banned X also stated a fine of 10k for anyone using a VPN to circumvent the ban.
      Difficult to police and enforce, but it’s been made clear that accessing X is considered illegal

      • Monomate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        In other words: the judge issued an order that affects everyone, not only the parties involved in the judicial process, and without the need for each affected individual to be formally notified so he/she can know how to avoid being fined. So, he basically legislated by himself. No wonder people are saying he’s a dictator.