Highway spending increased by 90% in 2021. This is one of many reasons why car traffic is growing faster than population growth.

  • TheGalacticVoid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago
    1. How so? Wouldn’t autonomous cars disincentivize car ownership, meaning fewer cars that can be on the road?
    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      See the argument of induced demand: “Oh everyone is using self-driving cars, that means there’s more space for my car!”

      • Farid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’m not a car owner, so I might be wrong. But I don’t think it’s normal for people to decide owning a car based on whether or not there’s room for it.
        Also, I think they meant that self-driving cars that will be taking non-owners to their destination. Since there’s already a car that’s taking me, I don’t need to buy my own.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          When people feel there’s more room for cars/infrastructure is more hostile to walking, they are more inclined to buy and use a car. That’s why adding lanes to highways never works to reduce traffic. You are not making more space for the same amount of cars, you’re inducing non-car owners to switch and get one, or already existing car owners to use it more, resulting in more cars in circulation.

          Similarly, autonomous cars are perceived as taxis which people irrationally perceive as emotional license to acquire and use a car. Narratives like cars as freedom or tech companies coming to take your car.

          Sure, it is counter intuitive, but there’s a billion dollar marketing industry dedicated to exploiting this and other similar cognitive biases. See green washing and the use of recycling to promote further consumerism. Or using health labeling to keep unhealthy foods in high demand, etc.

          • Farid@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            The problem you described sounds more like a side effect of the core issue – corporate greed. Cars can be bad, and overuse is a problem, but let’s not blame them for the faults of the system. Until the core issue is fixed, nothings will be truly efficient and useful, because those aspects will be sacrificed to profit.