• JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    All of these would be fixed by banning in game purchases with real money.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s probably not going to work. There will be less incentive for companies to work on a game if they can’t turn it into money stream. Especially big and expensive games. I think the outline above is pretty fair and a good start. They should throw on top of it banning loot boxes since they essentially develop gambling behavior in children.

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t get this. Charge a reasonable price for the game, which should include all in game content. Don’t make people pay for the game and then for more stuff in the game, especially if it gives them an unfair advantage over other players just for having paid.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Then games like Fortnite or Apex Legends wouldn’t make sense because the whole idea is that in-game spending funds ongoing development. Development and servers cost money, and assuming that new game sales will continue indefinitely doesn’t make any sense.

          What I think we should do is require discontinued MP games to be self-hostable, improve price transparency, and ban in-game purchases for minors. That should do a lot to correct the poor behavior of these companies without destroying the evergreen MP game model. This won’t impact games that already do things mostly ethically (e.g. Minecraft) and will require changes to the worst of the abusers.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m so tired of this shit. I don’t like the model so let’s ban it! It’s a free god damn game.

      Can you name a single FoSS OS that isn’t charging for a SLA’ed security updates? Selling software this way was created by the open source teams in the first place.

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t know what SLA’ed security updates is, but charging for software support outside of the software, is different from paying for perks in a game that give you an in game advantage over other players just because you paid and they didn’t.

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          So we’re just inventing stuff here? The vast vast majority of games have cosmetic based dlc.

          I love how you are splitting hairs here too. Security updates are optional, got it 🙄