• Auster
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    No. You ignored the receipt part.

    • Auster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      And also the part that they keep quiet about their issues that end up hurting customers, which, if it’s not clear, isn’t exactly uncommon.

    • EatATaco
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      So they paid for it? Or it wasn’t a demo? Which part makes the answer a “no”?

      • Auster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        It is a demo, it is free, but free titles are treated the same in the users’ accounts. So if the user didn’t want a content removed from his/her account, they should not have done it. And the type of question you made before is usually followed by “but if it’s free, then there’s no problem”, so my answer was meant also as an anticipation of that.

        • EatATaco
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          And the type of question you made before is usually followed by “but if it’s free, then there’s no problem”

          Whether it is a problem or a violation of their principle seems subjective and up to the individual. But it’s certainly an important factor to note, if we are going to be calling them out for hypocrisy.