Supreme Court Justice John Roberts has been left “shaken” by the unexpected public reaction to his ruling in the Donald Trumppresidential immunity case, a columnist wrote Friday.

Slate’s judicial writer Dahlia Lithwick wrote that Roberts was left shocked that Americans didn’t buy his attempt to persuade them that his ruling was not about Trump, but instead focused on the office of the presidency. The court ruled that a president was largely immune from criminal prosecution for official actions.

Lithwick referenced a report by CNN’s Joan Biskupic. He “was shaken by the adverse public reaction to his decision affording [Donald] Trump substantial immunity from criminal prosecution," she wrote.

"His protestations that the case concerned the presidency, not Trump, held little currency.”

  • SoylentBlake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If you think the Democrats are going to come out playing hard ball, expand the court, Statehood for DC and Puerto Rico, protect bodily autonomy…

    Buddy I got news for you…

    The Democratic party is fiscally neoliberal and socially reactionary. They are incapable of spearheading change, that would be socially proactive. All they did for BLM was change a street name. All show, no action.