Access options:

I think that what’s not in this article, but needs to be, is that rooftop solar in the rest of the world costs about 1/4 what it does in the US. Getting US prices down to where they are elsewhere would do wonders for closing this big gap.

  • BertramDitore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    As with most issues in the US, this seems like another battle between individual needs and corporate profit incentives. Rooftop solar costs more than a solar farm because of economies of scale, but also because the more capacity and storage individuals have, there will be less and less demand to have utility companies act as the arbiter of our energy supply. That’s not in the best interest of utility companies, but is absolutely in the best interest of consumers and the environment.

    My parents got scammed into leasing solar panels, so their energy bill is tiny, but their monthly lease payment is as much as their electric bill used to be. Who does that help? The corporation, not the consumer. Once storage capacity has parity with solar power generation, particularly in terms of cost and size, every house/apartment should come standard with a battery that can store any excess power without needing to be connected to the grid. Power companies will really hate that, so they’ll probably do all they can to keep control and keep rooftop prices high.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m planning to lease rooftop solar and from what I’m hearing from others who have it, it’s anywhere from 30% to 60% cheaper than what they were paying before (and that includes the $15 fee) depending on their roofline.

      I totally agree with what you’re saying, though. I just don’t want people avoiding looking into it because they think it’s not a money saver when it might be. You HAVE to get quotes. The companies will give you all the number estimates up front based on map data and pictures

      • BertramDitore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s a really good point. It completely depends on the locale and companies involved, don’t let me discourage anyone from looking into getting solar. I think my parents got into it a little too early, so there were very few options, and they’re locked in to a shitty plan now. Regardless, solar is still probably the best option for most people.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, there’s a lot of solar companies around here now so I’m getting quotes from several to compare.

          One caveat I should have added is that I have no idea if any of them have home batteries which definitely affects both the lease fee and your usage of utility electricity (no/small battery = paying for electricity at night). I am hoping to get a battery that will cover the essentials for at least 3 days but I don’t know if it’s cost-prohibitive

          • BertramDitore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, adding a battery to the plan was totally cost-prohibitive for my parents when they were getting started, but I’d assume those costs have come down a good amount. It’ll still probably be a big expense, but the math might work out better these days.