• treefrog
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ahh, nm. I see the point you’re making. Yes, zygotes should have rights. But the mom’s come first. We do agree.

    Yeah, 16 weeks seemed a good place to draw the line. With difficulties still leaning towards the mother.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think there needs to be a line at all. What pregnant person is waiting 4 months to decide to carry to term? If it’s happening that late, it’s because they’ve been forced to by medical circumstance, not idle fancy. Adding the line just makes it so there are edge cases where injustice can still occur. I suppose it would be just as effective to leave the late term stuff as “for medical purposes only” but I honestly don’t think it’s required.

      • treefrog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair enough. Sorry for misunderstanding your position.