I’ve used enough chatGPT to recognize it’s writing patterns. One of the things that stands out the most is saying you want to have a discussion, but not actually saying anything that needs to be commented on. That’s a telltale sign for an AI response.
Edit: Oh, and you’re a mod of an AI community? I’m certain it’s an AI response now.
It’s my response filtered through AI to avoid your manipulations and keep the conversation aimed at what I was asking about to begin with and not what you attempted to change the context to. :) Any other dodges?
But you cited ‘the news’ as a source. Lol. I didn’t even bother clicking your links when I first responded, but I went back and humored the idea that maybe it wasn’t… but really? cbsnews? Definitely a bastion of truth with no corporate sponsorship or interests…
I was citing the news to show events that happened yes. No claims about that news was made. Are you saying those Nazi events didn’t happen?
You are ignoring my questions because you know the answer. It’s why your talking about the validity of the source instead of the content of what I’m saying.
Wow, someone doesn’t want to spend effort arguing with people so close-minded they end up citing logical fallacies after they’ve been using them to make their argument the whole time. WOW GG.
This is an AI response isn’t it?
I’ve used enough chatGPT to recognize it’s writing patterns. One of the things that stands out the most is saying you want to have a discussion, but not actually saying anything that needs to be commented on. That’s a telltale sign for an AI response.
Edit: Oh, and you’re a mod of an AI community? I’m certain it’s an AI response now.
The sub and the server is getting infiltrated by Nazis and/or bots. 🤔
My bet is either AI or someone sporting a fedora
Lol, nice “edit” interesting you didn’t put the first part of your edit after what you said was an edit?
It’s my response filtered through AI to avoid your manipulations and keep the conversation aimed at what I was asking about to begin with and not what you attempted to change the context to. :) Any other dodges?
Lmfao.
Good conversation though.
K
But you cited ‘the news’ as a source. Lol. I didn’t even bother clicking your links when I first responded, but I went back and humored the idea that maybe it wasn’t… but really? cbsnews? Definitely a bastion of truth with no corporate sponsorship or interests…
I didn’t cite “the news.” I have specific article that supported my point that Nazis/right-wing fascists are gaining power in the world.
Are you saying those Nazi events didn’t happen?
I was making fun of you for citing the news as a source. Do you consider soundbites facts as well?
I was citing the news to show events that happened yes. No claims about that news was made. Are you saying those Nazi events didn’t happen?
You are ignoring my questions because you know the answer. It’s why your talking about the validity of the source instead of the content of what I’m saying.
🤣holy shit gg
Wow, someone doesn’t want to spend effort arguing with people so close-minded they end up citing logical fallacies after they’ve been using them to make their argument the whole time. WOW GG.