A revived legal dispute over a Christian music teacher’s refusal to use students’ preferred names and pronouns will offer an early test of the US Supreme Court’s new standard for religious accommodations in the workplace.

A revived legal dispute over a Christian music teacher’s refusal to use students’ preferred names and pronouns will offer an early test of the US Supreme Court’s new standard for religious accommodations in the workplace.

  • Zombiepirate
    7·
    11 months ago

    I’m confused about what part is against her religion:

    • calling kids by their name?
    • not being a bigot?
    • not making everything about her?

    Regardless, we know whose religious rights will be protected by the SCOTUS most high: the one who is imposing her ignorant worldview upon a captive audience. Funny how believing in magic gets you extra rights in this country.

    • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
      3·
      11 months ago

      She doesn’t have a religion unless you count hate as a religion. She claims to be Christian because they’re allowed to say and do whatever they want and can point to a book they’ve never read as a justification of their hate.

      Jesus would smack the shit out of her.

      • Zombiepirate
        2·
        11 months ago

        Sure, but Jesus would have smacked the shit out of Paul, too. It’s kind of been that way since the beginning of the religion.