I’m sure a lot of regular photographic techniques apply, but what might be some specifics to keep in mind with smartphone cameras in particular?
For example, would camera app choice make much difference, or is stock preferred as being more likely to have the most access to the camera’s hardware/sensors? What are some ways to mitigate or prevent any automatic “improvements” to photos taken via smartphone outside of whatever simple settings stock camera apps may provide?
Regarding that last question, might that be the breaking point where one might prefer a more dedicated camera over a smartphone’s camera?
Thanks! Trying to get a better sense of working within the constraints of smartphone cameras to learn when or if I might want to move on to a dedicated camera is why I was asking this, and I think your points have helped get a better sense of some of the constraints to take into account. Appreciate it!
Glad I could help.
I found some exmaple photos of super shallow DOF and the effect of aperture size in night photography. Doing this sort of magical stuff requires inconveniently heavy and expensive hardware upgrades. If you happen to like architecture, you’re absolutely going to need a tilt-shift lens. You can also use those lenses to make a real scenery appear as if it’s from a scale model. Nowadays you can also find lots of photos where that effect has been faked in post, but a tilt shift lens will be able to do it for real. Also, the fake versions don’t take distance into account and might blur the wrong parts of the photo for that sexy miniature look.
If you already know you don’t care about bizarre photos like that or if you know that carrying heavy equipment isn’t your thing, then going with a nice point and shoot camera will open up several new possibilities too. For example, having the ability to control depth of field even a little bit is incredibly valuavble in many situations.