Artwork created by artificial intelligence isn’t eligible for copyright protection because it lacks human authorship, a Washington, D.C., federal judge decided Friday.
Honestly that makes sense to me. Copyright protection only extending to human works might be the only way to keep creatives fed in a new AI dominated paradigm.
Exactly. These kids with their computors don’t know how to create art anymore. In my days, all we needed was a hand, some red ink, and a nice dry spot in a cave.
Honestly that makes sense to me. Copyright protection only extending to human works might be the only way to keep creatives fed in a new AI dominated paradigm.
Exactly. These kids with their computors don’t know how to create art anymore. In my days, all we needed was a hand, some red ink, and a nice dry spot in a cave.
On the serious note, screw the copyright.