• kwking13
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s may be true for you, but a lot of these type sites are a great source for news and information about the world. Ignorance is bliss as they say, but the world keeps spinning whether or not you pay attention to it. I’m not saying you HAVE to get news from social media, but that’s what I primarily use it for.

    • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      If it doesn’t cause you to act, then the news is just entertainment

      Covid vaccines made available was the last news that actually changed my behavior. That was like years ago. The rest is just entertainment written to make people scared and angry

      • BigNote
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Bullshit. Responsible news consumption is how we make informed decisions about the world. It’s a critical part of any democracy which is why Burke called it “the fourth estate.”

      • purahna@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        this. A lot of news is kind of inactionable too; what are we supposed to do from knowing about some dictatorship half way across the world having a coup? The thing that actually started lifting me out of passive observation and into action was reading political analysis and political theory. Strongly recommend some introductory political theory for anyone who feels a responsibility to keep up with the news but then finds that all doing so does is make them exhausted and depressed.

      • Remmock@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That sounds like a ‘you problem’. I change my behaviors and my attitudes accordingly based on what I intake and digest. When McCain first ran against Obama, he was a moderate with decades of experience who had seen the dark side of war and wouldn’t thrust us into one senselessly.

        Thanks to the news I saw the rapid conversion of a formerly moral politician into someone who would say anything for power.

        When the situation in Maui came up I donated as I have in the past to people affected by disasters.

        Should you assume information that doesn’t affect you personally is irrelevant or are you willing to step down from your Main Character title card?

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sorry but I don’t have the ability to stop caring how the world is doing

        • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sorry in advance for the unsolicited advice, but if you’re a news junkie (like me), try out an RSS feed reader (Feedly, Inoreader, Newsblur is a FOSS option).

          You get to bypass the comment section of social media while still being aware of what is going on around you. I use Ino because it’s cross platform. It makes it super easy to subscribe to anything from Nature to Vogue to my local news affiliate, and it has a trending section, as well as curated groups for hobbies/interests and your work industry as well.

          You don’t have to stop caring about the world in order to live without social media.

            • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Oh I totally understand, I’m the exact same way. But lately looking at social media comments is the equivalent of taking +1000% psychic damage.

      • kwking13
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I appreciate the concern and know about the potential negative consequences. But with all due respect, you don’t know me or the type of news I seek out or how I feel about it. I prefer to know what’s going on around me and the world so I can work towards making impactful changes. That doesn’t mean everyone else has to but it works well for me.

    • nte@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Social media is for social interaction. There are better alternatives for news. I’d rather invest some money in good journalism than picking relevant news in the flood of garbage click and rage bait articles. There is also good, free of charge journalism out there. For example the guardian

      • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is so honestly so true. Once I moved my news sources onto an RSS app and left my social media interactions for my hobbies or catching up with people my pessimism decreased dramatically.

        News on social media is filled with bad actors, misinformation, and bots deliberately to drive up engagement through outrage. 99% of the time it’s not worth the mental blowback.