• lorez
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I bet it wasn’t used to describe an angel of death…

        • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, it was used to describe Jews, Roma, Homosexuals, Communists, and pretty much everybody the Nazis disliked.

          As the poster further up the chain said, decency is for everyone or it is not decent.

          • lorez
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I disagree. I’m not talking about some group of people some other group doesn’t like, but somebody who’s universally despised, somebody who does things so against our nature it’s nuts. Some people deserve decency, some others do not.

            • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I disagree, it is dangerous to dehumanise people no matter how disgusting we find them. People are still people man, we may never understand how they think or why they do the things that they do.

              History has shown time and again where dehumanisation leads to.

              • lorez
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not dehumanizing. Some things she doesn’t deserve cos of her behaviour. Freedom of movement for example. To me she doesn’t deserve decency either.