• GivingEuropeASpook
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    God, if only people could just like pool their resources together to build homes or something…

    We could even call it something like “social housing,” and have it be a publically regulated service instead of treating housing as some sort of game of investment for the wealthy? No no, totally impossible…

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Even going back to the way things were in the 70’s where workers got a fairer share of the products of their labour that wasn’t leeched away by non-productive shareholders would make a huge difference. There’s a reason you could buy a house on a single income when you had 5 kids back then.

      • derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Hell we had deals where if you build the house yourself, they will give you the plot of land absolutely for free. But that was 30 years ago. I am absolutely sure people these days couldn’t do it - either not manually skilled enough, but have the money, or manually skilled, but their job doesn’t pay well enough to afford spending time building a house.

      • GivingEuropeASpook
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well, the 70s was before the time of Reagan and Thatcher coming in and wrecking unions and deregulating commerce and industry.

    • droans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      You also pretty much described what S&Ls were.

      Honestly wish they could make a comeback, but we’d need to ban them from becoming national organizations. Their biggest benefits were that they helped people get houses, provided proper financial advice, and kept money local.

    • xavier666
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      We are limited by the technology of our time

      • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It kinda did, didn’t it? People are still living in those buildings, right?

        • ZodiacSF1969@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          They live in rundown shitholes mostly.

          I tried to add a photo to this post but images seem to be banned atm due to the attacks on Lemmy. Just Google it and see the beauty of the land of krokodil.

          • Techmaster
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’ve heard that in the Soviet countries, they have very tall apartment buildings, many don’t even have elevators. Some have elevators, but you have to pay to ride them.

          • GivingEuropeASpook
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Not really. There are “commie block” apartments across not just Russia but lots of Eastern and Central Europe that are more desirable, pleasant, and cheaper than many new developments in the US and UK.

            You can also look at Red Vienna housing, another socialist urban design.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        State-owned apartments are working out well in pretty much every other country on earth. And certainly in everyone region exceot perhaps North and South America.