• DesertCreosote
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    As the press release I linked explains, IBEW represents a lot of rail workers, though not all. Sick leave agreements have also been reached with several other rail workers unions, which means that around 60% of rail workers now have sick leave. That’s still less than it should be, and the unions should not stop pushing until 100% of workers have sick leave, but it’s progress.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/most-unionized-us-rail-workers-now-have-new-sick-leave-2023-06-05/

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      IBEW represents no rail workers. they have one small branch representing a few electrical workers that work at railroads. But because they’ve been the biggest Biden apologists, rich folks have latched onto them as the face of rail unions. Look, they’re happy to not be allowed to collectively bargain.

      Unions shouldnt stop pushing, they were fucking banned from pushing for sick leave. How can they ever bargain for anything ever again after this precedent?