Update: so, the responses this far are almost universally that these bots have been blocked by users of the community. There is also a general disinterest in defederating, which is on brand.

You guys wanna do a poll or something or?

I’d like to lead my thoughts with a quote from the admins regarding bots within lemm.ee:

“Bots must not be responsible for the majority of content in any community”

There are two entire instances that immediately spring to mind, zerobytes.monster’s b0t user, and lemmit.online. Their content is quite literally 90% bot content with 0 engagement, and they spam constantly.

Now here at lemm.ee we generally don’t defend from stuff, that’s actually why I prefer this instance. Yes, you can block the bot users and that solves the problem, but hear me out:

These bots ruin the experience on Lemmy for new users. They spam so many posts, attempting to block them from a mobile app will usually crash the app. If you’re a new user coming to Lemm.ee sorting by all, you see tons and tons of empty posts.

Zerobytes is particularly egregious because it doesn’t even repost actual content, just thousands and thousands of links to Reddit posts. It’s a spam instance, period, and I feel strongly about this.

Lemmit.online isn’t quite as bad, but it’s an entire instance dedicated to spam reposting everything from Reddit. All the posts have zero engagement, and the comment value is gone so everything decent gets buried.

Yes there are ways around this on an individual user level, but then you’re creating a context where there’s even less engagement in the vast majority of “new” posts.

Anyway, thems my thoughts. Repost bots are stupid, one that drive traffic to Reddit are even worse. Thoughts?

  • @sunaurusMA
    link
    508 months ago

    Thanks for posting this, OP.

    I have heard this negative feedback regarding the repost instances many times from several users, and conversely, I have not heard any positive feedback about those instances at all.

    At the moment, my perception is that these instances universally disliked here, and as they are objectively having a negative effect on lemm.ee through effectively creating a ton of spam without any real discussion, perhaps we should indeed consider defederating. I would really appreciate if people who actually enjoy content from those instances could share their thoughts here!

    • @cerevant
      link
      English
      98 months ago

      Perhaps it would be useful to look at the subscriber numbers for these communities? Maybe contact some of those subscribers directly, since they are the ones who requested the content in the first place? I would venture that people interested in a non-interactive firehose of links is probably a lurker and wouldn’t respond here.

      If a lot of these communities have one subscriber, It could be that someone subscribed just to get the community on All.

      I’m generally of the view that defederation to curate content is a bad idea. I’ve seen suggestions to have the ability for an instance to exclude certain communities from All, or maybe Lemmy needs a semi curated Popular feed like Reddit.

      • @cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        38 months ago

        I know I accidentally subbed to some when I was looking for communities to add to my feed. I need to go through and remove them now that I know what they are.

    • @TexMexBazookaOP
      link
      88 months ago

      Thanks for boosting the discussion, I’m curious to see if anyone enjoys these bots as well. Thanks for all your efforts 🙏

    • Jordan Lund
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      I would really appreciate if people who actually enjoy content from those instances could share their thoughts here!

      Well that’s the trick, isn’t it? They don’t engage with the bot posts, if they were enjoying them then wouldn’t they engage?

      • megane-kun
        link
        68 months ago

        One counterpoint is that these bots offer a way to “browse Reddit content” without giving Reddit anything. And if browsing posts is the only thing one is after, one could enjoy the content but not interact with it, not even an upvote nor a subscription (to the repost community).

        However, I don’t know of any way of measuring such interactions other than people telling us that they do.

        Personally speaking though, the best, or worst, or perhaps spiciest part of reddit posts are in the comments. Just the post, without the comments providing the meat of it to me is kinda empty.

        I’m fine either way since I rarely, if ever, encounter such Reddit reposts from bots. I’ve never subscribed to such, and I almost never encounter them in the wilds of “All.”

    • @Kalcifer
      link
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I would vote nay for defederating from them. While I personally found their content annoying, someone else may actually find it uesful. I blocked the users, and the problem was solved. This issue may arise again, however, if more spam users pop up on these instances than a single user could reasonably be expected to deal with. This could possibly, again, be fixed by the user blocking the instance, but this would have to wait for user-blocking of instances to be implemented.

      • @HelloHotel
        link
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Im generally on the side of reposting for archival and continuation. however, the “throw it out there” half-assed ness and lack of transparency of these services make it a no deal. If I were to remake one (and ive thoght about it) a simple “upload and done” approach is discusting. These bots (clarified: probably should create their own instance for the task) need communal love and care to be anything but “a fire hose of content”. I propose the following:

        1. Allow the community to control most aspects of the bot behavor.
        2. Do not upload/add to queue unless initated by a lemmy user
        3. Allow users to vote on post deletion, add resistance or disable if there are many non bot comments.
        4. Allow users to vote on the bot’s upload speed and what gets priority (up/down vote this comment)
        5. Pin an admin post to act like a “settings menu” for the project
        6. Pin an unintrucive admin comment in every post to vote on actions for the post
        7. Use as little boilerplate as possable. Hide in spoiler what you cant avoid.
        8. Use one bot account for uploads, one blocked user blocks the whole service.
        9. Put human and machine readable metadata of the original and repost in a spoiler.
        10. Use 8 or so well labeled “sorting bot accounts” to aproimate upvotes of the source relative to its negboring ccomments. Should be no more sway than ±8 votes. Bot votes Should be disclosed in the metadata.
        11. Call the bot somthing like “reddit archive” put source’s username in the post/comment body
        12. Allow off instance admins to moderate bot posts
        13. Prefix all communities with somthing like "auto: " for transparency
        14. Allow partial reuploads and omition of threads for admin/data cleanup purposes.
        • @Kalcifer
          link
          18 months ago

          Im generally on the side of reposting for archival and continuation.

          Unless an instance has been built with the intention of archiving information, I don’t think that it should be automatically expected that an instance would be in favor of archiving posts from other platforms – there already exists services that archive internet data, and they are better equipped to do so. An instance should outline in their rules whether or not they support such types of posts.

          • @HelloHotel
            link
            1
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I generally agree, ill add that to the post.

            Edit: oh, it was written but poorly explained that it should be its own instance.

            Allow off instance admins to moderate bot posts