• Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There isnt enough land on the planet for everyone to own a house. And why even stop at a house. Everyone should owm multiple acres and homestead.

        • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes lets bulldoze all of nature so everyone can own a house. And yes it is true.

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            ‘yes it’s true’ except it’s objectively not, there’s about two and a half trillion acres in the United States and only 330 million people, there’s over a billion acres of actively productive arable land alone.

            And no you don’t need to bulldozer nature, learn to live as part of it and be a positive impact on the worlds ecosystems. Low impact living and permaculture gardens with local sustainable food networks are far better than cities on every metric

            • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There are many chunks of that they are unliveable. Also who said this discusion only involved the US? Do you think erasing farms from existence would some how be a good idea? Or are you in favor of people returning to agrocultural serfdom?

              • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The numbers are the same for the rest of the world, it’s a huge planet.

                And yes monoculture industrial farms are awfull for the planet and bad by every other metric. Community produce exchanges and permaculture gardens is the best solution, automated tools for home growing should be a key focus of government r&d budgets.

                  • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Your source says even just land currently used for grazing livestock is more than enough to house everyone, that’s without considering all the land already used for habitation and etc.

                    It really is a very big planet, I don’t know if you hate people and want them to suffer or what your deal is but you’re welcome to live in the smallest box you can find, don’t try and force the rest of us to though.

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      An apartment is a box in the sky, really just a big room.

      You realize that not every apartment is a studio in a skyscraper, right?

      and then some asshole rents the unit next to you and starts having parties, getting his junkie friends visiting all the time

      How is this different from an asshole moving into the house next door?

      A house is a house. Everyone should have a house.

      Houses are fine. The big problem with them is that most are in a boring sprawling soulless suburbia. The most important thing about where you live isn’t the physical structure itself but location, location, location.

      • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The other big problem is most places in the US and Canada make it literally illegal to build anything but a detached, single-family house. If houses are really what people want, why are the alternatives literally illegal in most places?

      • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would say quality archetecture has way more to do with quality of life. I wouldnt say beach bums have a high quality of life and yet “location”.

      • PraiseTheSoup
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is this different from an asshole moving into the house next door?

        What a silly question. You don’t share walls, hallways, mailboxes, front doors, laundry machines, and parking lots with your neighbors when you live in a house. Honestly, have you ever even lived in an apartment?

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve literally never had a problem sharing hallways, mailboxes, front doors, laundry machines and parking lots with people.

          The only problem you tend to have with neighbors is noise. And you can easily get that in suburbia as well, particularly if they’re throwing noisy late night parties.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cope and seethe

      It’s funny how every time we come up with a funny insult to describe you people, you just take that same exact phrase and use it against us without understanding what the hell it means.

    • KevonLooney
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a troll account created 4 hours ago. Report and block.