Former President Donald Trump’s legal team may need to come up with a more “creative argument” in defending him as their legal one “ain’t working,” former Republican National Committee (RNC) chairman Michael Steele said on Saturday.

Steele’s comments come after Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows was handed a legal loss on Friday after trying to move his case to a federal court instead of a state one.

The former White House chief of staff is facing two criminal counts, accused of trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia, along with Trump and 17 other associates of the former president. All 19 defendants from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ indictment have pleaded not guilty to their various charges. Meadows took the stand in Georgia last week to argue that his case should be tried in federal court, given that his actions tied to the indictment fell under his responsibilities as chief of staff.

U.S. District Judge Steve Jones wrote in his 49-page filing order on Friday, however, that Meadows’ actions fell outside the requirements of a White House chief of staff.

  • WarmSoda
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s the former RNC leader saying it. The guy that ran the Republican National Convention.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      That doesn’t make him one of Trump’s lawyers. The headline says Trump’s Lawyers realized something while the content of the article has no information or quotes attributed to those lawyers. Just random drivel from other people with no direct knowledge of the lawyers’ thinking.

      • WarmSoda
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You seriously think the guy who ran the Republican party has no information about how the former Republican presidents criminal case is doing?

        I do agree there should be words from the lawyers, but I don’t think they can legally make comments like that.

        I could also completely wrong.