A top adviser to President Joe Biden, whose prominent communications firm helped launch a high-profile effort to assist victims of sexual harassment, rape and assault, was also a paid adviser to a powerful Illinois politician while he was being sued by one of those victims.

Anita Dunn, co-founder of the communications firm SKDK and widely considered a member of the president’s inner circle, provided “crisis communications” assistance to Michael Madigan, who was then speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives, from 2018 to 2019. That work netted Dunn and her firm more than $200,000, according to campaign finance disclosures.

Madigan, who was also the leader of the state Democratic Party at the time, was not personally accused of sexual misconduct, but was being sued by a former employee of his political committees. That former employee, Alaina Hampton, alleged that Madigan retaliated against her when she reported that her direct supervisor had repeatedly harassed her in text messages.

While Dunn was advising Madigan, Hampton received support in her case from Dunn’s firm, which partnered with the anti-harassment charity Time’s Up. Dunn’s work for Madigan was specifically focused on responding to allegations stemming from Hampton’s lawsuit.

As a result, SKDK (the D stands for “Dunn”) was on the one hand supporting Hampton in her harassment and retaliation case through its partnership with Time’s Up, and on the other getting paid by a defendant in that very lawsuit.

Hampton said Dunn and SKDK’s representation of Madigan was not disclosed to her at the time.

“They never told me that they were also working for Michael Madigan, and had they disclosed that with me, I would have never applied for legal funding or PR support with them,” Hampton told NPR in an interview

  • Cleverdawny
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s only a potential conflict of interest for the client, aka the person paying for a consultation, and if the client was okay with it, then there’s not a problem, ethically, in the legal world. It’s not like the consultant was personally involved in the case except on one side, their involvement in times up is via donations.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hampton said Dunn and SKDK’s representation of Madigan was not disclosed to her at the time.

      “They never told me that they were also working for Michael Madigan, and had they disclosed that with me, I would have never applied for legal funding or PR support with them,” Hampton told NPR in an interview

      I mean, dude, it’s right in the text of the post. You don’t even have to click the article to read it.

      • Cleverdawny
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        They had no ethical duty to disclose that to her, only their client. She wasn’t their client, she just got funding from an organization they’re tangentially connected to via donations. It’s right in the article.