During the trial it was revealed that McDonald’s knew that heating their coffee to this temperature would be dangerous, but they did it anyways because it would save them money. When you serve coffee that is too hot to drink, it will take much longer for a person to drink their coffee, which means that McDonald’s will not have to give out as many free refills of coffee. This policy by the fast food chain is the reason the jury awarded $2.7 million dollars in punitive damages in the McDonald’s hot coffee case. Punitive damages are meant to punish the defendant for their inappropriate business practice.

  • BearOfaTime
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And guess what, neither did the jury. They assigned 20% of fault to her.

    But you seem to not know this, yet keep on victim blaming.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like she does deserve 20% as you just admitted. Oh noes there goes ur high horse.

      • BearOfaTime
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re the one with the high horse from your hubris, mate.

        So far you’ve strawmanned, goalpost moved, and ad-hom’d.

        Got any more sophistry you’d like to trot out?