• Armen12
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    The victim might disagree

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      They would be wrong. It doesn’t do anything to change what was done. The only thing it does it makes things worse for everyone. Everyone is forced to pay for their incarceration and it removes someone from society who could contribute to it instead. It’s a burden to society, not a boon.

      • Armen12
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Easy to say if someone close to you has never been harmed, but I doubt so many victims would agree that it’s wrong. People who are victims also have a right for justice to be done on their behalf. It’s not something you can just wave away.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          What’s a solution that doesn’t do damage to others, let alone doing damage to someone who may still be redeemable? The event can’t be undone. There’s no way to change that. The outcome that does the most good should be the one used, not the one that makes you feel good because you got them back, which doesn’t help anyone. That momentary joy will be gone in time, but the suffering of either party will never be changed.