• eee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s an issue of cost and density.

    This is like saying “why don’t people build apartments in the suburbs”

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      … why don’t they? Europe goes from skyscrapers to block of flats to apartments in the suburbs and very few houses on the very outskirts. The US seems to go skyscraper - single family house

      • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Because the entire US has a “missing middle” and a suburb problem brought on by big corporations. You get into you car, burn gas for 20 minutes to go to their 1 super mega everything mall. They also banned the idea of having local store in a “residential area” to force you to go to the everything store.

        The missing middle

        • TimewornTraveler
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          that explains why suburbs are bad, not why apartments wouldn’t work there

          • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Not sure where you got “appartments wouldn’t work there”.

            The entire video is about the missing middle, the midrises /appartments missing between the suburbs and the city. As pointed out in the video, the missing middle comes from the fact it’s illegal to build midrises in most “residential areas”