• June
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    My idea is that the art is being sold and the NFT only says who owns it. It doesn’t need to be digital art, it can be just about anything where an original creator should benefit from the item changing hands.

    Whenever the NFT changes hands, there are fees associated, which would include a portion of the sale going to the original artist, a royalty. And because the NFT exists on a publicly visible blockchain, back alley sales can’t happen ensuring that the artist gets paid.

    This type of thing helps ensure that artists benefit from their art going into demand and increasing in value.

    • moormaan@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Blockchain mathematically guarantees trust… for info stored on the blockchain. What guarantee do you have that this info matches things that happen in reality?

      If you say: we need a social contract to ensure people update the blockchain, then I say: that defeats the purpose of the heavy lifting you need to mathematically guarantee info on the blockchain is genuine. Let’s just have a social contact to pay the artist when appropriate.

      I don’t see what other way could exist to keep the blockchain and reality in sync.