• MishMash
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    There were funds appropriated for a portion of the wall in 2019 by Trump with the requirement that construction is completed by the end of 2023. Biden asked congress to reappropriate the funds, as he does not have the power to do so, and congress refused. His hands are mostly tied here from what I understand.

      • 4am
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, instead it would be a good idea for Biden to give Congress an ACTUAL reason to impeach him, ensuring that either Cheeto Mussolini or Little Rhonda show up and install a fascist state.

        It’s 20 miles of a 2000-mile border. I’ll take “keep defeat of the impending fascist takeover on the table” over “concrete case for impeaching Sleepy Joe”

        It’s a good goddamn thing some of you aren’t in charge of literally anything.

        • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          you actually think ad hominem counts as a debate tactic? Swing and a miss.

          Ill make it easy for you. You make a salient point. Anything with a link showing the class you actually have looked into this and are better than some drunk raving in a bar.

          I can’t wait to see you ignore my instructions, show your ass, and give me a greater sense of superiority than you have already provided me today.

          Go

        • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s a good goddamn thing some of you aren’t in charge of literally anything.

          i’m sure you feel that way. after all, we’d never build your racist fucking wall, you piece of shit

    • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn’t do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

      • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah Congress didn’t tie his hands and force him to override laws (which by the acts definition should only be invoked to protect the nation against threats).

        He could just add easily declare his hands tied by the 26 laws he is instead breaking. He could say the wall’s completion wouldn’t do anything to enhance national security (something i recall libs saying when it was trumps wall).

        This is a lie, plain and simple.

      • prd@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand.

        • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          So you can’t tell me what’s forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he’d face and from where?

          • 4am
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            This fucking guy thinks the president is a king 😂

          • prd@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it.

          • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            “President” is not “King”

            Money is controlled by Republican Congress.

            Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President.

      • sik0fewl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not defending it, since I’m not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he’s done it.

        • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Cool. You feel better now that you’ve joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit?

    • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      hahahahahahaha “the man in charge of the country and the political party in power have no say! they have to do the incredibly evil thing! the money couldn’t just sit there and not get used, that would be a worse sin than putting up barbed wire and machine gun nests”