• TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    31 Democrats, including Fetterman, called for his resignation after the first indictment. Now, after a second indictment, Fetterman is calling for his immediate expulsion.

    We cannot have an alleged foreign agent in the United States Senate.

    I think it’s important to note that, at this stage, these are merely allegations. Menendez has not had his day in court, he has not had a formal opportunity to reply to the allegations. He should certainly face some sort of suspension, but taking away his senate seat flies in the face of “innocent until proven guilty” and sets a dangerous precedent.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, it’s a 2/3rds majority to expel a senator, the evidence in the case is damning, and he skated by on corruption charges before through a hung jury. I don’t think we need to worry about slippery slopes because we don’t wait years for a trial to resolve.

      And being expelled from the Senate isn’t a criminal matter, it’s a political one. Senators can be expelled even if they’re not guilty of a crime.

    • Doesnotexist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      . I agree, and I disagree. What if the evidence against menendez is so compelling that there’s no doubt of his guilt I actually don’t know. If some Republican brings up charges against the democrat, on stupid evidence, and everybody could see it stupid evidence, then of course that Democrat should not be expelled.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        While they certainly could expell the Senator based on evidence against him, that evidence isn’t being presented yet. At the moment, we just have indictments, and given the nature of the evidence (intelligence sources) it probably won’t be revealed until it’s in court - if it’s revealed at all. As such, the Senate can only really go by the outcome of the court case, not the evidence directly. They couldn’t expell a Senator without telling the public why.

        The issue with the Republicans doing this kind of thing is that their base will easily lap up any fictional reason they give as “evidence”. So while many people will see it as stupid, a significant and very vocal group might not.