cross-posted from: https://links.hackliberty.org/post/226775

After living in a region that was (foolishly¹) designed exclusively for cars, I moved to a proper city: a city with public transport and a cycling infrastructure. Started using public transport and felt liberated. No more insurance burden, no maintenance burden, no vehicle registration, no traffic fines, parking fees & fines, no more financing unethical right-wing oil companies that are burning up the planet, etc. It was a weight off my shoulders to live cheaper and more ethical.

public transport also unethical

Then a colleague convinced me that using public transport needlessly is also unethical… that the huge amount of energy required to power that infrastructure is still harmful & wasteful. Public transport needs to exist for various reasons like serving disabled people, but when able-bodied people flood onto it, more vehicles must be dispatched more frequently and I was adding to that burden.

the winner: cycling

So after years on public transport I switched to a bicycle. It’s even cheaper than public transport. And it came with another upgrade to liberties:

  • privacy— my realtime whereabouts is no longer surveilled & tracked (no license plate readers, no public transport card readers w/DBs, no insurance records which can then intermingle with other insurance & credit records & cause harm in other ways).

  • independence— it’s easy to maintain one’s own bicycle. So I’m free of dependency on mechanics & free of dependency on public transport schedules (which can be unreliable). Dirt cheap and you only need to depend on yourself.

After evolving into a cyclist, I cannot stomach the thought of living again in a non-cyclable region. Those regions are encumbered by stupidity and addicts: people addicted to their perception of convenience (despite sitting in traffic that bicycles are immune to and despite looking for parking)… and people addicted to energy (from oil or power plants) because they think peddling their bike will be a notable effort.

Intelligence of car drivers

It’s been said jokingly (by Douglas Adams IIRC) that dolphins are smarter than humans because they’ve figured out how to get their needs met without investing crazy amounts of cost and labor to create things that work against them to some extent. Cyclists are like dolphins in this regard, as they see people work their asses off to be able to afford the car that takes them to work, where they earn the money to finance their car ownership so they can work more. At the same time they work to finance the oil politicians who work against them.

2023 research suggests cycling makes you smarter and apparently 2014 research suggests cyclists are more intelligent² (I suspect there’s the factor that people with naturally higher IQs favor cycling anecdotally. E.g. many profs cycle to universities).

self imprisonment

We all live in a prison of some kind. My new prison is being self-excluded from a big chunk of the car-dependent world and living in all those regions. But I prefer my new prison better than that of car dependency and being forced to finance companies that finance politicians who work against humanity.

footnotes

¹: it would be unfair to fault pre-climate aware municipal designs as foolish, but foolish that decades thereafter these shitty designs are still being maintained (unlike Utrecht who were wise enough to realize their mistake & fix it) while people continue rewarding the shit designs with their residency and tax.

²: I’ve not read the 2014 study myself. Some articles claim the research shows cyclists are perceived as more intelligent while other reports claim cyclists are more intelligent.

  • girl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Actually, you should’ve tracked down the research. You are the one posting very short articles which make claims about research, but they actually have no research in them. To make this claim responsibly, you are responsible for actually providing the research.

    There are no citations in the articles you linked, they just make claims about research. And the titles are sensationalist, the one article that goes slightly in depth to one unnamed study also says that people who walk are more intelligent. This suggest that the research is actually just pointing to the way any exercise helps the brain. Without citations, we have no way of checking any potential bias of the writers, or seeing how large the sample sizes are for the article that boldly claims cyclists are more intelligent.

    This is incredibly flimsy research at best, if not intentionally misleading and dishonest to push this weird cyclist elitism.

    • comrade-bear@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah furthermore it’s wholly unnecessary, the health benefits and all make a better argument to that point, but still many places specially in the US are designed in a way to make cars all but a necessity, so if you live in a place where the distances you need to travel are reasonable and cycling is safe sure, but that’s in no way a broad generalization