The slide’s authenticity was confirmed by a Navy spokesperson, who cautioned that it was not meant to be an in-depth analysis.

The slide shows that Chinese shipyards have a capacity of about 23.2 million tons compared to less than 100,000 tons in the U.S., making Chinese shipbuilding capacity more than 232 times greater than that of the U.S.

The slide also shows the “battle force composition” of the countries’ two navies side-by-side, which includes “combatant ships, submarines, mine warfare ships, major amphibious ships, and large combat support auxiliary ships.” The ONI estimated that China had 355 such naval vessels in 2020 while the U.S. had 296. The disparity is expected to continue to grow every five years until 2035, when China will have an estimated 475 naval ships compared to 305-317 U.S. ships.

Another section of the slide provides an estimate on the percentage each country allocates to naval production in its shipyards, with China garnering roughly 70% of its shipbuilding revenue from naval production, compared to about 95% of American shipbuilding revenue.

Because of China’s centrally planned economy, the country is able to control labor costs and provide subsidies to its shipbuilding infrastructure, allowing the Chinese to outbid most competitors around the world and dominate the commercial shipping industry, Sadler said.

Alternative title - “Central planning is more efficient than markets” confirms US Navy

  • Redrum714
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yea Uncle Sam shoulda escalated the war killing millions of more Koreans instead of resolving it peacefully….

    I swear the anti-American circle jerk has given you people brain rot.

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “resolving it peacefully”???

      you arrogant, ignorant slime it ISNT FUCKING RESOLVED. a state of war exists between the Koreas with a ceasefire, not a peace treaty. the US dropped more munitions on Korea during this “de-escalation” than in the entire pacific theater of WW2. 1.2 million civilians were killed by the united states in the north, to this day the US imposes sanctions on essential goods to the DPRK, trying and during the 90s succeeding in starving their people. you talk about peace and Korean lives while defending the singular obstacle to peace and human wellfare in Korea, read a fucking book and become less of a monster

      • Redrum714
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes a ceasefire is peaceful compared to full blown war you fucking moron. The only thing keeping NK a complete shit hole is themselves and China.

        It truly takes a special kind of stupid to think the DPRK is the victim here.

        • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          the full blown war did not stop when the US was forced back from the north by the Chinese and Koreans. 2 more years that you are somehow failing to perceive of warfare on the 38th parallel and indiscriminate bombing of civilian targets in north korea. two years of endless bombing of every fucking building the US airforce could find, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people.

          only thing keeping NK a complete shit hole is themselves

          oh no, history stops existing the moment the US stops actively bombing you, how could destroying their country possibly affect them after the fact. why would the US bans on exports to a country they blew up all the fucking factories in affect their well-being. and why are the Koreans so rude to America after all this?

          • Redrum714
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The full blown war stopped when they agreed on a ceasefire… the US didn’t bomb North Korea after that, the hell are you going about?

            South Korea was devastated after the war as well, yet they’re a thriving modern country today. The US is still technically at war with NK so why the hell would they trade with their enemies?

            and why are the Koreans so rude to America after all this?

            Probably because they chose an ass backwards authoritarian regime that makes their lives miserable up and to this day. Yet South Korea is one of the most pro-American countries in the world, weird how that happens huh lol

            • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              the shocking confidence of someone who doesn’t have the barest outline of the subject repeating the canned lines they learned in what, middle school? like its fucking gospel. you literally can’t follow what you said in this comment chain, your first response to me was asserting the lack of US progress after being defeated by China and Korea in the North was out of a desire for peace. i have refuted this with the evidence of warfare continuing for two years after that and now you’re acting like this fact is inadmissable.

              South Korea was devastated after the war as well, yet they’re a thriving modern country today

              and is there anything different in say, who the south was allowed to trade with in contrast to the north? any country with military bases in the south that gave it a lot of economic aid perhaps?

              • Redrum714
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lmao I think you’re just arguing with yourself at this point. Do you think there was 2 years of fighting after the ceasefire or something? Nothing I said was outside of literal historical records, but I guess if you view recorded history as “gospel” I can understand why you are so historically inept.

                and is there anything different in say, who the south was allowed to trade with in contrast to the north?

                Yea, people they weren’t at war with genius. Like holy shit a child would have better understanding of geopolitics

                • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  you didn’t know the war didn’t end after the US was removed from the north at the beginning of this thread, or you profoundly misunderstood the character of the later stages of the war. now you’re attempting to cover for this by claiming i don’t grasp the chronology and moving around 2 years of warfare i was never confused about the location of. check my first comment, lmao dork

                  what i want to know is what makes someone so fundamentally incurious and foolish that when they discover something they thought was true might be untrue, instead of investigating or listening to people eager to educate them, they dig in their heels and deploy all the tricks in their (quite insubstantial) rhetorical arsenal to insist upon the falsehood. it’s okay to be wrong about things, it won’t kill you

                  • Redrum714
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’re arguing with yourself again lol

                    Never once did I say the war ended when the US was getting pushed back. The war “ended” with the signing of the armistice and it’s been a ceasefire ever since. The Korean War timeline is not that complicated.

        • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It truly takes a special kind of stupid to think the DPRK is the victim here.

          Yeah only stupid people could possibly think that the targets of an indiscriminate bombing campaign that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians are victims at all.

          Like, fuck all the way off you chauvinistic freak.

          • Redrum714
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We’re talking about post war, pay attention dipshit.

          • Redrum714
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yea I guess if being educated with reality is a hivemind count me in.