You can’t “fix,” say, Capitalism into not having a power dynamic of class-based society, only band-aid fixes. This isn’t exclusive to Anarchism, all forms of radicalism cannot be meaningfully implemented into existing Neoliberal Democracy.
Why do you imagine groups would need to go against the rest of society in order to gain, rather than work cooperatively? How would they go against the consensus?
Why do you believe hard decisions cannot be achieved without centralism?
Why do you think Anarchists are proposing mob rule, which is a centralized position, rather than a form such as Participatory Economics?
Much of your questions are based on preconceived notions of Leftism and Anarchism that are better answered in longer, more dedicated sources than a lemmy post comment section.
Why not just fix the system?
What’s to stop larger groups acting in their own interest under anarchy? What would stop them?
Governance is making hard decisions and compromises, not giving everyone everything they want all the time.
When compromises eventually arise, and there’s 70% blue team and 30% red team, why wouldn’t blue team dominate?
You can’t “fix,” say, Capitalism into not having a power dynamic of class-based society, only band-aid fixes. This isn’t exclusive to Anarchism, all forms of radicalism cannot be meaningfully implemented into existing Neoliberal Democracy.
Why do you imagine groups would need to go against the rest of society in order to gain, rather than work cooperatively? How would they go against the consensus?
Why do you believe hard decisions cannot be achieved without centralism?
Why do you think Anarchists are proposing mob rule, which is a centralized position, rather than a form such as Participatory Economics?
Much of your questions are based on preconceived notions of Leftism and Anarchism that are better answered in longer, more dedicated sources than a lemmy post comment section.