His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • tsonfeir
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Taxi? I mean, I guess? If I was a taxi driver and a bunch of people from the Westboro Baptist Church tried to get into my cab, I’d speed off for sure.

    Teacher? Hmm. Well, they can try. But, humorously, it’s just like a “conservative” to deny a child an education. It’s all about the kids right? Trash.

    Doctor? No. They are governed by rules that prevent that.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ok, so let’s hope that the supreme court agrees with you and draws the line at taxi drivers. Because today they let photographers discriminate you and tomorrow they can decide that the rules for doctors are unconstitutional.

      • tsonfeir
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I understand your fear. But my opinion isn’t going to impact that crooked group. It’s not like I voted for them. Whatever is gonna happen is gonna happen regardless of what you or I do. We’re all fucked. I may as well be allowed to legally discriminate against the people who can legally discriminate against me. 🤷‍♂️

      • aksdb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do you really want a doctor treat you who despises you? Can you still trust them to do their best?

        The real problem lies deeper than this.

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          So where you live doctors just let people suffer/die if they don’t like them and it’s ok? You don’t have any oversight, expert panels, ethics boards, investigations? That’s wild.

          • aksdb@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            You don’t think there’s a range between doing the bare minimum and giving your best? I don’t say they let you die, or send you away. I said I wouldn’t be sure they treat me with the same effort they treat someone they like (or at least don’t dislike).

            • ExLisper@linux.community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I think you watch to much TV. That’s not how medicine works. How do you imagine it? I go to a doctor with migraine and he starts thinking real hard what could be the cause? And if he ‘despises’ me he just doesn’t think as hard?

              There are procedures doctors have to follow. If they fail to follow the procedures it’s malpractice. The procedures are the same for all doctors. There’s no ‘look, I did the bare minimum, you can’t punish me’. Either you did what was required or you didn’t. Each time a doctor would mistreat someone on purpose because he ‘despises’ them they would open themselves for investigation and a court case. That doesn’t mean there are no shitty doctor making mistakes, they would just have to be really dumb to do it in purpose.

              • aksdb@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Doctors are just humans. If they have a good day (hopefully often), they go out of their way to help you. I had a doctor call me on his personal time because he cared, and looked into literature to figure something weird out. But I also was there when he had a bad day (he was sick himself and a shit ton of patients to go through) so he just gave me a sick note, quick checkup and let me go. Doctors aren’t machines who work in an objective and reproducible way.

                • ExLisper@linux.community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You’re talking about a basic GP visit. The standard/expected practice is to prescribe ‘best guess’ medication and see if it improves. As you said you can get the equally bad treatment from a tired/sick doctor as from one who ‘despises’ you. It’s just a common risk everyone accepts so you’re comments about not wanting doctors who despise you treating you makes little sense. You can tell the doctor isn’t very good and go to another one. Where it could be important is a hospital visit and there are procedures to follow there. Doctor can’t just give you a sick note and send you home. If he does that’s malpractice.

    • mx_smith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think it depends if you are a contractor or an employee. A contractor like a cab driver or photographer sure they can refuse clients, but a teacher and Dr are both employees of a school district and insurance company who have a public image to uphold.

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        A contractor like a cab driver or photographer sure they can refuse clients

        In certain cities cabbies are actually not allowed to refuse clients, particularly to avoid discrimination issues