Self defense? Only on the battlefield? Only to achieve a ‘noble’ end?

  • Tamo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Surely protecting is by definition preemptive since it means you are not allowing the violence against yourself or someone else to occur? Not saying your first point is wrong just doesn’t seem consistent to me.

    Only revenge/retribution would not be preemptive which imo is not better.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Preemptive is a different word from defending because they mean different things. Preemptive violence is violence that happens before a threat exists because of the possibility of a threat.

      So shooting your neighbor on Tuesday because think he might be violent on Wednesday. If on Wednesday he shows up and makes verbal threats of imminent violence, responding to the threat of violence by being violent first would be self defense and not preemptive because the threat actually exists at the time. Timing and context matter, not who literally who gets off the first shot/punch/violent act.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      There are situations where people have created a situation where you don’t have total knowledge of the future, but acting in defense seems justified.

      I think we can quibble over the specifics about what’s reasonable, but you don’t have to wait until you’re bleeding out to defend yourself.

      • Tamo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        For me personally, the answer to the original question would be “only once no other non-violent means are available”.

        Does this resonate, or would you consider it different to your perspective? I see them as similar.

        • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Personally, I’d prefer non-violent over violent means for myself. If other people are involved it would depend - I won’t risk someone else’s life if I can avoid it. I tell my niece that she’s allowed to stab dudes that don’t respond to “no”.