• TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    You are making a disingenuous argument that ignores the entire point I made.

    Disinformation campaigns do matter if you’re only having occasional votes - you can slip through a bad decision every once in a while. If you vote on everything, then it wouldn’t matter, because you’ll have a vote in review where the flawed vote would be corrected.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only one making disingenuous arguments here is you bud. Your whole argument is based on a completely unfounded supposition that the current system does not end up fairly representing the will of the public. There is no evidence to suggest anything of the sort that I’m aware of.

      Meanwhile, the whole idea of direct democracy that you’re peddling here doesn’t scale beyond small communities. Failing to understand why delegation of concerns is a necessary aspect of any complex organization exposes infantile understanding of the subject you’re attempting to debate.

      • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        He’s Just Asking Questions though! You mean commies won’t let him come into your space and JAQ off in peace!

        • relay@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Perhaps they don’t understand the concept of questions recieving answers that don’t take false assumptions seriously.