A Colorado judge has rejected an attempt to remove former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 primary ballot based on the claim that he is constitutionally barred from office because of the January 6 insurrection.
I’m not sure if you’re aware of this, but the presidency is a civil office in the United States.
You’re just reiterating an earlier point which, when challenged with a question, was answered with a claim that they didn’t include the POTUS because they couldn’t fathom the POTUS being the bad-guy. Which I demonstrated as ridiculous, in-and-of-itself (and you completely ignored, BTW), but also how it defeats your own point. You’re chasing your own tail around here.
Again, incorrect. I listed that as one of the two possibilities.
Fair point, I stand corrected.
Sorry if I get frustrated when you keep trying to jam the fork in there anyway.
You don’t have to apologize to me as you’re frustration is not with me, but yourself.
Ok, hey - this has been fun and all. But um… we’re running into a bit of a brick wall here. See, you think you’ve demonstrated something that you haven’t. You think that two completely separate points I’ve made are the same thing. You think you’re actually making cogent, non-insane points. Etc.
Basically, you’re just a frustrating pile of wrong. And not, like, little wrong things, either. Huge, flashing, fuck-off wrong things. And as much as I’ve enjoyed repeatedly replying to you and saying essentially the same thing over and over, I am aware that that falls under that apocryphal definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
So yeah. I’m going to just stop responding to you now, and probably take a couple of headache pills. I’m sure you’ve got plenty of people in your life you can frustrate instead.
You’re just reiterating an earlier point which, when challenged with a question, was answered with a claim that they didn’t include the POTUS because they couldn’t fathom the POTUS being the bad-guy. Which I demonstrated as ridiculous, in-and-of-itself (and you completely ignored, BTW), but also how it defeats your own point. You’re chasing your own tail around here.
Fair point, I stand corrected.
You don’t have to apologize to me as you’re frustration is not with me, but yourself.
Ok, hey - this has been fun and all. But um… we’re running into a bit of a brick wall here. See, you think you’ve demonstrated something that you haven’t. You think that two completely separate points I’ve made are the same thing. You think you’re actually making cogent, non-insane points. Etc.
Basically, you’re just a frustrating pile of wrong. And not, like, little wrong things, either. Huge, flashing, fuck-off wrong things. And as much as I’ve enjoyed repeatedly replying to you and saying essentially the same thing over and over, I am aware that that falls under that apocryphal definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
So yeah. I’m going to just stop responding to you now, and probably take a couple of headache pills. I’m sure you’ve got plenty of people in your life you can frustrate instead.
It was only a matter of time before you went back to just insults. Have a good night.