CEO Jack Dorsey tells workers he’s making it easier to fire them — There are reportedly no more performance improvement plans at Block::Jack Dorsey, CEO of Block and founder of Twitter, reportedly told workers it will now be easier and quicker to fire them.

  • @BearOfaTime
    link
    English
    2
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    You keep presenting this “ideal” PIP. I’ve never seen one be successful, and I’ve repeatedly seen a significant increase in them before layoffs.

    Every PIP I’ve seen has been full of BS. Had one engineer who saved the company tens of millions of dollars for the current year, and whose effort in those 3 months also enabled the company to prevent renewing a contract that would’ve cost tens of millions per year, for 8 years. (He was asked in August if this could be done, had to be done by Dec 20).

    Less than a year later he was PIP’d because people didn’t like that he was amazing at predicting risks - his 360s said he was pessimistic and negative. Yet his predictions were correct 90%+ of the time. I hated to lose him, he prevented so many issues and costs.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      I’m sure there are folks who abuse the system. I’m just speaking from my experience and what I have observed with my peers. When folks in my org are on a PIP, they’re almost always people that are widely known to be a problem.

      Moreover, when I’m talking to my fellow directors / managers at my company about people in their orgs that are on PIPs, those are almost always people that my org constantly complains about.

      The experience of one person doesn’t reflect the behavior of the entire industry. But I feel like I’ve collected enough experience and a broad enough peer network to know that my experience is not uncommon at all. I’ve heard these stories a LOT over beers.

      • @BearOfaTime
        link
        English
        26 months ago

        Again, after nearly 30 years in enterprise, I’ve repeatedly seen them expanded just before layoffs.

        And 360s are nothing more than popularity contests. They’re ripe for abuse.

        • Ghostalmedia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          25 years in enterprise here. Different experiences I guess.

          I’ve always liked 360s where people get to nominate the folks on their review panel. Those reviews still have a bias, but it’s arguably toward the person being reviewed since they’re picking their own reviewers.

          But if they’ve picked their own jury, and still got broadly called-out for being a pain in the butt, that’s not a great sign. If your best working relationships are also bad working relationships - yikes.