ickplant@lemmy.world to Lord of the memes@midwest.socialEnglish · 7 months agoWell, that's just like, your opinion, manlemmy.worldimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1463arrow-down117
arrow-up1446arrow-down1imageWell, that's just like, your opinion, manlemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Lord of the memes@midwest.socialEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareDroneRights [it/its]linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down14·7 months agoMaybe the author is just really upset and feels the need to be mean about it. I don’t see the need to be mean back, condescension in an article never hurt anyone.
minus-squareThe Assman@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 months agoIt’s literally rage bait
minus-squareDroneRights [it/its]linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·edit-27 months agoI don’t believe rage bait is this common. There’s no evidence for this conspiracy theory that the author is hiding anything.
minus-squareCeruleanRuin@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoWhy else would he be writing about a movie that came out twenty years ago? Might as well write an article about how shitty you think Lawrence of Arabia is.
minus-squareDroneRights [it/its]linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·7 months agoWe are on a sublemmy devoted to a 20 year old movie. People still watch LOTR.
Maybe the author is just really upset and feels the need to be mean about it. I don’t see the need to be mean back, condescension in an article never hurt anyone.
It’s literally rage bait
I don’t believe rage bait is this common. There’s no evidence for this conspiracy theory that the author is hiding anything.
Why else would he be writing about a movie that came out twenty years ago?
Might as well write an article about how shitty you think Lawrence of Arabia is.
We are on a sublemmy devoted to a 20 year old movie. People still watch LOTR.