Driverless cars were the future but now the truth is out: they’re on the road to nowhere::The dream of these vehicles ruling the roads remains just that. Focusing on public transport would be much smarter, says transport writer Christian Wolmar

  • Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can’t land a helicopter at the club without a bunch of pansies whining about “public safety”, as if a few heads on the street is such a big deal.

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Aerotaxis would still be aircrafts.

      I don’t know why people imagine that making an aircraft the shape of a car suddenly landing would be as simple as going to a parking lot.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s just a joke, friend.

      • eric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Air taxis are sometimes helicopters or quadcopters, and while they aren’t parking in parking lots for cars, but could still end up landing in what equates to a parking space. In New York City, they are already presenting plans to expand an air taxi hub on a pier in lower Manhattan to transport people and goods to and from the city, and it looks like a bunch of parking spaces with a logistics facility attached.

    • BearOfaTime
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hahahahah.

      You cut off a few pansy heads and everyone gets all upset.