Politically-engaged Redditors tend to be more toxic – even in non-political subreddits::A new study links partisan activity on the Internet to widespread online toxicity, revealing that politically-engaged users exhibit uncivil behavior even in non-political discussions. The findings are based on an analysis of hundreds of millions of comments from over 6.3 million Reddit users.

  • @Kusimulkku
    link
    English
    50
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’d imagine the same is true for Lemmy and politically engaged people (at least online) overall.

    • @paholg
      link
      English
      255 months ago

      I’m not so sure. The study discusses specifically people who engage in partisan subreddits, which is not the same as being politically engaged. It also uses an AI to grade toxicity, which surely mischaracterizes many interactions.

      For example, I have been in communities of a non-political nature, where political discussions occur. These are often about real issues that affect real people in the community, and yet there are people complaining about political content.

      To complain about political content is, at best, a very privileged take, demonstrating that you are in a position where politics do not affect you much. At worst, it is actively hostile behavior with the goal of continuing the status quo and shutting down discourse. I would call most of these kinds of comments “toxic”, and yet the rhetoric is usually fine, so I doubt an AI would agree.

      • @Kusimulkku
        link
        English
        75 months ago

        I’d say if you are politically engaged, the likelihood of you being in a political internet community is fairly high.

        To complain about political content is, at best, a very privileged take, demonstrating that you are in a position where politics do not affect you much.

        Could just be that they don’t care for politics in that community. Time and place for everything and it seems some feel the time and place for politics is everywhere all the time. It can be tiring. I don’t remember what year it was that pretty much every single place was talking about immigration politics. Important topic for sure but a meme community about funny road signs isn’t the place for heated soapboxing about closing down the border.

        • @Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          85 months ago

          The thing is, what a politically engaged person thinks of as “politics” and what a disengaged one does probably has limited overlap. People probably aren’t bringing the Tories or the Republicans up in a D&D community, but bring up race portrayal or representation for disabled people and watch the sparks fly.

          • @Kusimulkku
            link
            English
            05 months ago

            People probably aren’t bringing the Tories or the Republicans up in a D&D community, but bring up race portrayal or representation for disabled people and watch the sparks fly.

            I wouldn’t bring up either up during a game. Unless I was prepared for some serious eye rolls and not being invited again lol.

            And unfortunately people do bring up the former during all kinds of shit. Politic brains are wild.

            • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              55 months ago

              People in a D&D subreddit aren’t playing D&D; they’re talking about playing D&D. Those are completely valid topics to bring up.

              • @Kusimulkku
                link
                English
                05 months ago

                Depends on the commynity. Some just don’t want politics being brought into them. If it’s allowed/not forbidden then by all means.

      • @SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Say you don’t like Linux here and tell me how many people call you a bootlicker lol

        Or even better - “piracy is theft” or “ads keep YouTube free and are thus good.”

        You don’t have to believe it. Just toss it up in a thread as a test and enjoy your next 12-36 hours.

        • Franklin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Just saying things “as a test” is indistinguishable from defending it online. Things like body language, tone and intent do not come across as easily.

          That being said toxic people exist everywhere on the internet it’s a flaw in our biology, we haven’t adapted to communicating this way yet.

          That being said there’s a difference between a bad take like your above examples and condoning oppression and marginalization as some political groups have do.

          One deserves to be defended vehemently.

          • @SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -7
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Just saying things “as a test” is indistinguishable from defending it online.

            Yes this is why it works as a test.

            That being said there’s a difference between a bad take like your above examples

            Only one of my statements is an opinion (I like a plug and play OS I don’t need to configure because I spend all my “customize” energy on my PC itself). The others are objective facts that make people sad.

            This is what I mean by toxicity, and how I know for a fact the test will work

            • Franklin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              45 months ago

              Testing people like that is not a great if your looking to dissect a viewpoint sounds more like being inflammatory, especially with your word choice.

              Opinions can be bad takes. See > your examples.

              • @SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I express exactly one opinion there, and it isn’t a “take” at all. “I don’t care for Linux” is not an inflammatory statement except to an absolute zealot.

                • Franklin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Sorry guess I should have been more clear. All of your examples are opinions as in not demonstrably fact.

                  I don’t particularly mind any OS one way or the other I’ll use the best tool for the job. What I’m saying is a bad take are your proposed scenarios on piracy and ads which there’s no evidence to support, in fact there’s a lot to the opposite.

                  This would make what you said an opinion and by my point of view a “bad take”. Does that make you wrong to express them? No and I never said as much.

                  So I guess I just lost the thread on your point because all of those are just opinions. I was just using a colloquialism. Which brings me back to my point that usually when I see people get heated it’s because people are being bigoted.

                  • @SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -25 months ago

                    All of your examples are opinions as in not demonstrably fact

                    Two of my 3 examples are not opinions lol. Ads do keep YouTube free. Piracy is theft. Those are facts. You can justify your blocking or ads or piracy however you want but that is not an argument against these facts.

                    But we’re getting into the weeds since the point is the insanity with which people respond, so frequently, and not the disagreement itself.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          The Linux thing, I doubt you’ll get toxic comments. You’ll probably get comments asking why to try to help, though that can always come off as demeaning. If you say Linux is bad, that’s different. You’ll likely get a lot of comments explaining why that isn’t true and that it’s a pretty ignorant take.

          For the other comments, “piracy is theft” is, again, an objective statement, not a value judgement. Saying that is to say people who disagree are wrong. Same with the YouTube one. Change “good” to “useful” would probably be better way to say it.

          There’s a difference between comments that judge other people (which will likely get a strong response) and comments that judge the subject. It’s something people frequently fail with. Even if it’s worded well, people will often take judging something they agree with as an attack on their character, which is also not useful. Humans aren’t logical beings.

          • @SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Saying that is to say people who disagree are wrong.

            They are wrong. People putting their own values (“I’m not a thief!”) into an objective statement are the people who are incorrect. You can justify piracy, but it is literally always a form of stealing. People here are very pro-piracy and, cool, so am I, but it’s stealing.

            Point conceded on the YouTube thing tho, it’s inexcusable to be loose with my language in a post I’m using as an example.

            Humans aren’t logical beings.

            To my great dismay. I’d have avoided a lot of issues if I were more logical lol

            • @homicidalrobot
              link
              English
              65 months ago

              Copying is not theft. When you steal, you leave one less left.

              • @SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -15 months ago

                Yes I’ve gone around this little carousel many times with people trying to justify it for themselves. You don’t need to justify anything to me. I’m not your dad.

              • @Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -25 months ago

                Like not paying for a haircut if the stylist didn’t have any customer at that time anyway. It’s a victimless crime!

                (Btw I have a large Plex server. So yeah, I’m a hypocrite.)

                • Cethin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  35 months ago

                  That took labor. Copying bits doesn’t take labor. We don’t have people working in a bit mine.

            • Cethin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              I don’t totally disagree, but I don’t agree either. Saying there isn’t a semantic argument to be had is terribly ignorant. If you own a car and I take it, sure that’s theft. If you own a car and I take a picture of it, that isn’t theft. I created something new that didn’t effect the thing you own.

              In the same way, creating a copy of bits of data does not effect the original item someone owns. It does not remove anything from them. If you’re not taking anything from them, how can it be theft? Theft requires something to be taken.

              • @SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -15 months ago

                I have near-zero interest in this conversation, but one can absolutely steal a service. You’re taking from them because to consume the product you were expected to pay, and their entire infrastructure revolves around that.

                How you feel about it is your business, but it is very cut and dry.

                • Cethin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  05 months ago

                  Sure, but it’s a product not a service.

                  It’s not as cut and dry as you seem to think. If it is cut and dry, I’d say it’s to the opposite of your opinion, but I don’t think it is.

    • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Why limit online? Someone got into a shouting match with me because I didn’t agree with what fox news told him. When I realized what he had dragged me into, I walked away.

      • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Because toxicity tends to falter in reality. Not to say there is no toxicity offline, there absolutely is. But you’ll find most of the toxic people have small dog syndrome. They’re all bark until they are face to face with someone. Excluding mob mentality of course.

    • lazynooblet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      As is on Reddit, the number of non-political posts with top level comments slandering republicans, seemingly totally off topic, is disappointing. I’m not American, so I don’t understand why so many conversations are simply “republican bad”. It seems obsessive.

      • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        85 months ago

        Because republican politicians what to limit the freedoms of other people. Many republican voters don’t, but they vote for “their side” anyway. Do I need to respect the republican voter that’s personally tolerant, but still votes for intolerance?

      • @tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        Because conservative bs affects almost everything in our lives. Not pointing it out just enables it to keep happening.