• TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    The appeal of money already stung them once. I maintain that the reason they had to release Cyberpunk before it was ready was because of contractual obligations and penalty clauses from a Hollywood actor they enlisted, in the hope of selling more copies with his name. Movies have much more fixed release dates than games and the actor’s agents were the big dog at the negotiating table, setting the terms to suit themselves. I’d like to think they’ve learned their lesson.

    Also, CDPR own GOG and have a stable income, one that relies on their current structure. I doubt anyone buying them would look to keep them DRM free.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Perhaps this is an unpopular opinion, but I think cyberpunk would have been just as good with somone else playing Johnny. Let’s be honest, it probably would have been better.

      Keanu may be a great guy, although I assume we mainly think that because of his PR company, but he’s not a particularly good actor. Film actors are also often worse at stuff like this than professional voice actors. It’s not an uncommon complaint.

      Not that I blame them, I assume they mainly hired him for marketing purposes, and he absolutely did help generate hype.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        I completely agree with everything you’ve said. Also, I don’t blame Keanu if he did have harsh contractual penalties with CDPR, as it’s his agents who negotiate contracts.

        However I would say that, while his PR team no doubt influence things, by all accounts he is a very stand up dude.

        • Hyperreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          How would we know though?

          He’s an A-lister and he’s represented by a big talent agency and production company.

          They can quite easily squash stories, simply by refusing media access to other stars or productions on their roster.

          Hell, for all we know he could be on Epstein’s list. Or he could be secretly donating money to donkey sanctuaries. Who knows?

          • TWeaK
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            People knew about Harvey Weinstein, that was an open secret. There are indications, Keanu displays none of them. There are also far too many anecdotes from random people saying how nice he is.

            Like I say, I’m sure his PR people help, but he’s probably one of their easier clients.

            We might not know for certain, but we can say with confidence that tales of his character are probably true.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Anything is possible, but A-list celebrities have hundreds of people and even whole news organisations trying expose any possible secrets they have.

            Trying to disprove him being a down to earth good person, is probably akin to dispensing the moon landing at this point…

      • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Keanu is a great human being, and absolutely cannot act. He was perfect for the role of Silverhand.